Archive for July, 2006

Quiz No.2 – Tactics Galore

July 29, 2006

By Louis Lima 

Here are twelve positions to stimulate your tactical senses. Some are hard. Some are easy. I flipped the board whenever it is “Black to Move” to let you feel being on the driver’s seat of the player uncorking the spectacular move.

If you would like a hint,  I provide you with the tactical theme at the end of the quiz.  The solutions can be found at the very end of this page. Don’t give up too easily! Your efforts will be rewarded in your games.

Position no. 1 – Black to Move - Kennedy vs. Dubois – London Telegraph Match 1862 

All of Black’s pieces are aiming towards the King. One will have to sacrifice itself to open the road to victory.

Position no. 2 – Black to Move – Schelecter vs Heinrich – DSB15 Congress 1906.

Too late to stop the g, but not too late to swindle a draw!

Position no. 3 – White to Move – Vassaux vs. Morrison – 8th Chess Olympiad, Argentina 1939

Strip Black’s King naked!

Position no. 4 - White to MoveCongdom vs. Delmar – USA Congress 1880

There is light at the end of the tunnel.

Position no. 5 – White to Move – Flores vs. Jhunjhnuwala – Luzern ol 1982

Black has just pushed the pawn to f6 in order to break the pin. Unfortunately this did not work thanks to a little deflection tactic. What did Carlos Flores played here?

Position no. 6 – White to Move – Flores vs. Elmejbri – Luzern ol 1982

White has a dangerous passed pawn but Black seems to barely be holding the position. It’s time to deflect one of the back rank defenders!

Position no. 7 – Topalov vs. Naiditsch – Dortmund 2005

Arcadij Naiditsch was the lowest rated player in this event, but won it ahead of world top ten players like Kramnik, Leko, Adams and Topalov! Here however, Topalov employes a back rank mating net to wrap up his game game against Naiditsch. Can you find it?

Position no. 8 – White to Move – Naiditsch vs. Leko – Dortmun 2005

Arkady Naiditsch won a clear pawn by visualizing a Rook and Bishop mating net. Can you see it?

Position no. 9 – White to Move – Nakamura vs. Kaufman – Washington Eastern Open 1999

Black is a pawn up, but Nakamura forced a draw in only three moves.

Position no. 10 – White to Move - Czerwonski vs. Polujahov – Bydgoszcz Pocztowy Open 1999

Black’s three connected passed pawns on the Kingside look mighty. Can you help White find an easy draw?

Position no. 11 – White to Move - Smolkov vs. Rumiantsev – Tchigorin Memorial 2002

One thing is to see  possibilities of 1. Bxh6 and 1. Rxh6 possibilities, and another is to work out the exact winning variations.

Position no. 12 – White to Move – Rosen vs Marquez – Paris 1900

White attacks on the Kingside, to get material on the Queenside. 

HINTS: Main Tactical Themes Involved in Each Position

Click here If you are unfamiliar with these tactical motifs to learn about tactis.

01. Row Clearance

02. Stalemating

03. Demolition of Pawn Structure

04. Stalemating

05. Deflection (Exploitation of a pin)

06. Deflection (Explotation of passed pawn)

07. Deflection (Exploitation of weak back rank)

08. File Clearance (Exploitatio nof weak back rank)

09. Visualize the position without White’s rooks.

10. Stalemating

11. Demolition of Pawn Structure

12. Demolition of Pawn Structure; Removal of the Guard

SOLUTIONS

1. Ng4!… Threatening mate on h1. If 2. fxg4 Rh3 and White’s king is surrounded.

2. 1…Re1+! Rxe1  stalemate.

3. 1. Rxh7+ Rxh7 2. Rxh7+ Kxh7 3.Qxf7 followed by Qxe7 with a winning advantage.

4. I disagree with those that say one should be a gentleman and resigned in a hopeless position, especially if Queens are still on the board. Here White stunned his opponent with 1…Qg8+! 2.Kxg8 stalemate.

5. 1.Rxc8 Qxc8 2.Bxd6 winning two minor pieces for the rook. This is a simple, yet good example of how white combined two tactical themes:(Pinning and Deflection)

6. Rxf4! Qxf4 2.Qxe7 (Threatening Qe8+ or d8=Q+) 2…Qf8 3. Qxg5+-

7. 1.Qf6+! Resigns. (1…Qxf6 Re8+)

8. 1.Bxa6! If 1…bxa6 2.Qxc6! (Deflection) 2…Qxf6 3.Rb8+ Bf8 4.Bh6 with mate to follow. Peter Leko saw all this and played 1…Na5 remaining a pawn down.

9. Hikaru rid himself of both rooks with 1.Rxa4+! Kxa4 2.Re5+ Ka6 (2…Rb4 3.Rxb4+ is equal) 3.Ra5+! Kxa5 stalemate. 

10. White stalemates with 1.Kxa8 Kc8 (Otherwise White playes Kb8 on his next move and queens the pawn on a7) 2.Bf4! gxf4 stalemate. if 2…g4 then White draws by keeping his Bishop on the h2-b8 diagonal to prevent the pawns from moving forward. 

11. 1.Bxh6! gxh6 2.Qe3! Ng4 The only move to give room to black’s pieces for the defense 3.Rxh6 Kg7 (If 3…Nxh6 4.Qxh6 and mate to follow) 4.Rh7+ Kxg5 5.Qe4+ Rf5 (5…Kg5 6. Rg7+ wins) 6.Qg4+ Rf5 7.Qxg4+ Bg5 8.Qh5+ resigns (8…Kf6 9.Qf7 mate).

12. Bxh6! gxh6 2.Qxh6 Qh7 3.Qxh7+ Kxf7 4.Bxb7 (Removing the defender of the c5 Bishop, the main point of the entire combination). 4…Bxf2+ (Desperadoing the Bishop) 5.Kxf2 Bxb7 6.Nxc5+-

Inventory of Mating Nets

July 23, 2006

What is a Mating Net?

A mating net is a checkmate position involving one or more pieces. The pieces that aid in checkmating a King need not to be on the band of the player that is checkmating. In fact, as we will see in the following example, our opponent’s pieces often betray their King by blocking any escape routes, while the enemy piece approaches to deliver the final blow. For cataloguing purposes, however, I will only be using the assisting pieces of the side that is checkmating. This will become clear in the example below.

This is a Queen-type mating net. I have catogued this type of mate as a Queen mate because the Queen is the only piece in black’s army that is assisting in the checkmate.

Putting aside the “catalogue” question, the reader will notice that Black is able to deliver checkmate, not because her majesty is worth 9 points and is all hot stuff, but also thanks to the Rook on g1 preventing the King’s escape. This theme crops up very often in mating nets, and here White wished the Rook did not exist in order to live another move. As Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt) says in the movie Fight Club “Sometimes the things you own end up owning you.”

What does mating nets have to with tactics?

A mating net is often the last move of a chess tactic that involves a checkmate (as opposed to a chess tactic that only gains material or other positonal compensation). Often times a chess player is able to visualize the possibility of a mating net, and wiith the aid of his tactical knowledge, ability to calculate, and degree of imagination, the player is then able to execute checkmate. When the player arrives at the final mating position he has, indeed, realized the mating net he first envisioned.

Knowledge of mating nets alone, however, won’t help you much in squeezing the opportunities in your chess games. You also need to work on your tactics and calculation. One of my chess desires has been to design and build my own chess sets. I often envision the chess set in its final form, but lacking any training in the arts and having “butter” hands as my wife bluntly says it, prevents me from creating the set as I saw it in my mind. The same applies here. One needs to work on tactics and calculation in order to arrive at the mating net. For those who wish to work on their tactics I have compiled a list of free sources online arranged by tactical motif:

http://community.webshots.com/album/559609683DMygtM

Moving on to a concrete example…

 

Here is an example taking the Queen-type mating net described earlier. The position is from an 1872 game (NN-Anderssen). Anderssen’s canvas is the chess board. He visualizes the Queen-type net mating on h3 once the pawn is removed from h2 and the Rook is forced to join the other side. Anderssen takes out his paint brush and begins his masterpiece 1…Bg2!+ 2.Rxg2 Qf1+ 3.Rg1 Ng4+! 4.hxg3 Qh3 mate.

What tactics were involved in this spectacular series of moves?

Deflection (1…Bg2!+, as the Rook is deflected in order to weaken the back-rank.)

Pinning (Black takes advantage of the pin of the Rook on g1 by Black’s Queen.)

We might not have the chess genius of an Adolf Anderssen, but you will agree that if this was a position from one of our games, and we were thoroughly familiar with mating patterns, the possibility of mating on h3 with Queen may have crossed our minds.

Inventory of Mating Nets

This inventory constitutes 196 example and it is by no means exhaustive. What’s important in viewing these nets is the mating pattern in question, and not the “exact” position. I have sometimes throw in a lot of material on the losing side, just to show the power of mating nets over material superiority.

The diagrams are hosted on a photo album.  You may want to Right-click on the link below and choose “Open in New Window” to keep this website open if you wish.

I will be adding some other nets by end of August. Enjoy!

http://entertainment.webshots.com/album/559266737flytsN

 

Tactics and Famous Mates: Free Online Sources for Tactical Training

July 22, 2006

By Louis Lima

The old saying ”Chess is 99% tactics” is very much true for beginner and intermediate players. You can’t afford to buy a book on tactics? That is no excuse! There are free sources online where you can find chess problems to equip yourself with the tactical tools of the trade necessary to capitalize on your chess positions and win your games. Below are several links which I have broken down by tactical motifs and famous mates.

I’ve also created an inventory of mating patterns in a different post. In conjunction with sharpening your tactical arsenal, these mating patterns can help you recognize the “end of the road” in a tactic (e.g. Springing a tactic thanks to being able to visualize a mating net). You can access it here:

http://chesstactics.wordpress.com/2006/07/23/inventory-of-mating-nets/

Feel free to post a free and relevant link you will like to submit, and I will update it into the right category. Go hone on your tactical skills!

TACTICS 

Pins (Pinning)

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

http://www.chesscorner.com/tutorial/tactics/pins/pins.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_strategy_and_tactics#Pins

Forks (Double Attack)

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_strategy_and_tactics#Forks

Discovery

http://www.markalowery.net/Chess/Tactics_Strategy/Tactics_Lessons.html

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_strategy_and_tactics#Forks

Clearance

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Deflection

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Dicoying

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Blockading

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Intermezzo (Intermeddiary Move)

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

X-Ray Attack (Skewer)

http://www.chesscorner.com/tutorial/tactics/skewers/skewers.htm 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_(chess)

Overloading

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Removal of The Guard (Elimination of a Defending Piece)

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Interception

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Pursuit (Chasing)

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Demolition of Pawn Structure (Breaking the Shelter of the King)

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Promotion

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1004732

Underpromotion

http://chess.go.ro/strategy-tactics/terminology/underpromotion.html

The Passed Pawn

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Pawn Breakthrough

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Stalemating (Stalemate)

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Alekhine’s Gun and other Batteries

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alekhine’s_gun

http://chess.about.com/od/reference/qt/bltip039.htm

Lasker’s Sacrifice

http://www2.forthnet.gr/chess/fgg_lasker.html

The Windmill

http://www.bu.edu/dbin/law/chess/index.php?Type=page&Action=none&From=3,2,6,1

The Queen Sacrifice

http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_orlov_middlegame/040422_part1.html

Entrapment

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Zugzwang

http://chess.go.ro/strategy-tactics/endgame/zugzwang.html

http://www.chesskit.com/training/tactics/intro.php?zugzwang

Desperado

http://chess.about.com/cs/reference/g/bldefdes.htm

 

FAMOUS MATES

Smothered Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Eupalette Mate

http://www.princeton.edu/~jedwards/cif/tactics.html

Boden’s Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Greco’s Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Damiano’s Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Morphy’s Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Morphy’s Concealed Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Pillsbury’s Mate

http://www.princeton.edu/~jedwards/cif/tactics16.html

Blackburne’s Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Lolli’s Mate

http://www.princeton.edu/~jedwards/cif/tactics.html

Anastasia’s Mate

http://www.princeton.edu/~jedwards/cif/tactics.html

Fool’s Mate

http://www.chesscorner.com/tutorial/basic/scholars/scholars.htm

Anderssen’s Mate

http://www2.forthnet.gr/chess/anders.html

Legal’s Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Reti’s Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Back Rank Mate

http://www.markalowery.net/Chess/Tactics_Strategy/Tactics_Lessons.html

http://chessebook.com/such_voll.php

http://chessebook.com/glossar.php

Two Bishoo Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Bishop + Knight Mate

http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/MatingThemes.htm

Quiz no. 1 Discovering Tactical Shots in Your Games

July 20, 2006

 

By Louis Lima 

Chess players often enjoy solving tactical puzzles in order to improve their combinational abilities. We can find these challenges in books on tactics, our favorite chess magazine, the chess column at the local newspaper, educational software, or websites dedicated to the subject. The authors of these puzzles often provide us with one or more bits of the following information:  

Who’s turn is it 

(e.g. White to move) 

Number of moves 

(e.g. Mate in three) 

The Tactical Motif 

(e.g. Puzzles are listed under the category “Discovery Check”) 

Outcomes 

(e.g. +/-, =, White to move and stalemate, etc.) 

Choices 

(e.g. Two or more candidate moves and you must pick the right one.) 

The piece to be used in the tactic

(e.g. The picture of a Rook above the diagram) 

An introduction 

(e.g. “This position exemplifies the perils of leaving the back rank undefended”) 

The chess problem itself 

(e.g. Often a clue that you need to find “something”)  

Some of this information helps us develop our tactical skills, such as solving problems according to tactical motifs. The reality, however, is that no such information is available to us while a game is in progress. How often have we gone over a game after it has ended, only to discover that we missed a simple tactical shot, or lost the game because we oversaw a threat?    

In our chess training we might have gone over all of Fred Reinfeld’s 1001 Winning Chess Sacrifices and Combinations thrice. We might be well verse on tactical themes like clearance, pinning, double attack, decoying, etc – but still miss on these golden opportunities because no angel is telling us there is a mate in three, or that a Queen sacrifice is in order. In the real heat of the battle we have to recognize these critical moments for ourselves.  To compound the problem, a player has to deal with tournament time controls. When should we invest the time in looking for a tactical shot? We obviously can’t do it at every single move since we need to budget our time effectively. When do we have the green light to explore a position further for tactical opportunities?  

Chess positions with tactical opportunities share clues and motifs that give an indication such tactics are present. Through the following ten chess positions I will illustrate these motifs. These examples might contain more than one clue, but only one is sufficient enough reason to probe a position further. It does not mean that there will always be a tactical opportunity, but it might and we do want to miss our chance to play a spectacular move! (or avoid have one be played on us)

This popular position was taken from my second favorite tactical book of all time, the Encyclopedia of Chess Middlegames (Informant 1980). Imagine the following scenario: You are black and it’s your move. You have 30 minutes left on your clock. Should you quickly parry the threat to your Rook on c8 and move it out of danger? or should you invest some of the precious time left on your clock to look for a tactical shot? This position begs for you to look for tactics because the following five motifs are present:  

I. Your opponent’s King is lined up with your Queen

Whenever one of my heavy pieces is lined up with my opponent’s King I look for tactics. Thanks to this motif there are possibilities of moves such as 1…Nf3+ here.  

II. Knight Forks            

Whenever I see the opportunity for Knight forks I take some time to look for tactical shots. Here we see the forking possibilities 1…Nf3+ and 1…Ne2+.      

III. Weak Pieces   Whenever there are weak pieces I look for tactics. Here the Rook on c1 is weak because it has one attacker (the Queen on g5) and one defender (the Queen on e1). Moreover, the Rook on c1 is even weaker because it is indirectly attacked by the Rook on c8 as well.  White could explore various things here, such as trying to deflect the Queen from the defense of the Rook, or deflect the Knight in order to win the Rook on c1.     

IV. Undefended Pieces

White has an undefended Bishop on b7 and an undefended pawn on b4.   

V. Checks

Whenever I see a check, no matter how silly, I explore the position further. The reason for this is that a check forces your opponent to do something about it. Check is the ultimate forcing move. In this position Black has four checks at his disposal: 1…Qxg2+, 1…Qxc1+, 1…Nxf3+, and 1…Ne2+ 

Armed with this knowledge we can begin to calculate possibilities. 1…Nf3+ does not work because of 2.Bxf3. 1…Ne2+ does not work because of 2.Nxe2 and the rook on c1 seems to be  adequately defended. 1…Rxc3 2.Rxc3 and there is no fork on e2 due to White’s Queen control of this square. 1…Qxc1 2.Qxc1 Ne2+ 3.Nxe2 Rxc1 4.Nxc1 and White emerges a piece ahead. However 1…Qxc1 2.Qxc1 Rxc3 3.Qxc3 Ne2+ and Black wins a piece. White does not need to play 3.Qxc3 and can choose a move like 3.Qf1, but then black has 3…Rc1! and Black will win the Queen either way.  Again, if the reader has not been working on his tactical skills then it is unlikely to find the correct solution, let alone the ideas behind it.  If they have, then the solution can be seen fairly quickly. Based on the above motifs, the player correctly assessed there was “something” in the position, looked further, and had the tactical training to find and execute 1…Qxc1!  

Another position from the Encyclopedia of Chess Middlegames. I think this is a very instructive example because it shows the importance of knowing your tactics. Here we have similar clues and new ones:  

I. Checks  As IM Danny Kopec once told us at a chess camp: “Never miss a check”. Here we have three checking possibilities: 1…Qf2+,  1…Qg1+ and, 1…Rh2+. If you have been solving decoy-type   tactical problems, you’ll immediately see the possibility of 1…Rh2+ 2.Kxh2 3.Qf2+ with the threat of 4.Rh8 surrounding the King. Obviously this is not currently possible due to Queen’s presence on e2. But maybe we can think of a way to force her away from the defense of the f2 square?   

II. Weak Pieces (or Pawns)  The Knight on c4 is weak because it is attacked once and defended once. We can look at ways to deflect the Queen from its defense, or pile up on the Knight through moves like 1…Bb5. The pawn on b2 is also weak because it has one attacker and one defender on it. Sacrificing the    Rook on b2 could be a useful option if White’s tactic involves trying to deflect the Knight on c4.  

III. Airy King  White’s King safety has been compromised as a result of the open h file and dark-square weaknesses. Look for tactics if the King is out in the open.  

IV. Weak Squares  White suffers from serious dark-square weaknesses and White’s Queen and Bishop are all over them. Black could think of possibilities of deflecting the Knight on g3 and coordinate the Bishop on f4 with a Rook on h2.  

V. Positional Advantages: Control of Open File  If you have a positional advantage, no matter how temporary, explore the position a bit further to see if you can immediately exploit it. Here Black has temporary control of the h-file, but it has to be used immediately because White could contest the h file in the next move.   

Although this puzzle was in the advanced section of the book, the answer came to me rather quickly. I wanted to first calculate ways to remove the Queen from the defense of the f2 square, so that I could play the decoy tactic 1…Rh2+ Kxh2 2.Qf2+. I immediately so potential sacrifices on g4, starting with the Knight, so that the Queen would be forced to move after White’s Bishop lands on g4. Thus 1…Nxg4 2.fxg4 Bxg4. Now the Queen is forced to move. The move I analyzed first was 3.Qxg4 to make sure the attack was winning, otherwise I would be down to minor pieces in this solution. 3…Rh2+ (Sacrificing a third piece) 4.Kxh2 Qf2+ 5.Kh3 Rh8+ 6.Nh5+Rxh5 7.Qxh5 Qg3++ or if 5.Kh1 Rh8+ 6.Nh5+Rxh5 7.Qxh5 gxh5 8.Rg1+Kf8 9.Rg2 Qh4+ 10.Rh2 Qxh2++.    

Here is another famous position from my favorite book on tactics: Tal’s Winning Chess Combinations by Mikhail Tal and Victor Khenkin. This is the most delightful book I’ve ever read on tactics and if you can get hold of a copy you’ll want to read it over and over again. I wish they could reprint this book. Here we see two familiar motifs and three new ones:  

I. Checks  

Black has a check available on e1 and one on h2.  

II. Undefended Pieces  

White has an undefended Rook on a1 and an undefended Queen on d3. Moreover, the rook a1 is x-rayed by the Queen on a5 and the Rook on a8.  

III. Batteries   

White has two pieces lined up on the same file. Both the Queen and Rook exert pressure on White’s weak back rank.  

IV. Pinned Pieces  

The pawn on b2 is pinned by the Queen because the rook is on a1. It wouldn’t matter if the Rook was defended or not. The fact that it is x-rayed by White’s forces give us a reason to probe the    position further and see if we can find something that exploits this factor. 

V. Positional Advantages: Back Rank Weakness  

Black’s battery means that two pieces are attacking the back rank, while only one (The rook on a1) is protecting it. Therefore, it is a good idea to look for tactical opportunities.  

White would like to play 1…Qe1+ so that 2.Rxe1?? Rxe1+ 3.Qf1 Rxf1 mates. However, White can play 2.Qf1! and everything is OK.  Bronstein found 1…Rxa3! Taking advantage of the pin on b2, threatening the undefended Queen on d3, and realizing the Rook on a1 cannot depart the back-rank with 2.Rxa3.  

This position begs you to look for a killer blow because we have several familiar clues:  

I. Checks  

1.Qxe6+ 

II. Undefended Pieces  

The Bishop on h4  

III. Weak pieces            

The Rook on e6 is weak because it has the same number of attackers and defenders on it. In addition, the Rook on e1 is indirectly attacking e6 as well. 

IV. Pinned Pieces (or the opportunity of being pinned)           

The rook on e6 is pinned by the Queen. Noticed that if there was, say, a Black Knight on f7, we  would still look for combinational possibilities since White’s Queen is in the same diagonal as the opponent’s King. Here I found the simple 1.Bf2, threatening the undefended Bishop on h4, while piling up on the pinned Rook on e6. 

This is a hypothetical position reached by Bobby Fischer in his analysis of Game 41 Fisher – Robatsch from his book “My 60 Memorable Games. White has four clues we have discussed already:  

I. Undefended Pieces  

On a5, d8 and a8. 

II. Battery  

Queen-Rook battery along the h-file 

III. Airy King 

IV. Checks           

On h7, g7, and f8, and indirectly on h8.                        

V. Your Opponent’s Queen in the Same Line or Diagonal with One of Your Pieces           

Black’s Queen is lined up with the Rook on h5.  

The solution is 1.g6. White cannot recapture on g6 because of 1…Rxa5, and any pawn capture will be decisive after 2.Qxh7+ or 2.Qh8+   

There are five visible clues in this position.  

I. Undefended Pieces  

Both of Black’s rooks 

II. Battery  

Queen-Rook battery along the open d-file 

III. Airy King           

Black’s pawn advances have compromised King safety 

IV. Weak Squares           

The dark squares around the Black King are weak.  

V. Weak Pieces           

The Knight on d7 is weak because it has the same number of attackers and defenders on hit.  

In trying to take advantage of the above factors I found 1.Na4!. Now most moves by Black will be answered by 2.Qxd7+! Qxd7 3.Nb6 forking the King and Rook.   

Here the position has the following obvious clues: 

I. Back Rank Weakness  

Black’s back rank is undefended 

II. Positional Advantage: File Control           

White’s Rook controls the h-file 

This was my most painful blunder because Tim was the highest rated player I had played so far under regular tournament conditions. Here I neglected to see my weak back-rank weakness coupled with Tim’s control of the h-file, and  instead of playing Re7 I played 1…f4?? allowing 2.Qe8+ winning the game. In chess the most painful moments contain the most valuable lessons for a player. One might hear advice such as “Keep your sense of danger at all times”, but we only begin to get the message until this happens to us a few times over the board.    

A pawn on the sixth or seventh rank is inches away from coronation, so we must look for ways to push the pawn to the finish line. We reached this position with Harold on move 73. Here White missed his opportunity to wrap things up and played 74.Rg1? and the game was drawn at move 90. However, if he had been hungry to push the f pawn he might have found the winning shot 74.Rg8+! sacrificing the Rook in exchange for two vital tempi needed to get the pawn to the queening square. Now If. 74…Kxg8 75. f7+ Kh7 76. f8(Q) and it’s all over. Or 74…Kh7 Rd8 and nothing can prevent the pawn from moving forward. In all fairness, the game was approaching midnight and we were both tired, besides me having a time handicap due to Harold’s role as TD and needing to spend time doing other things while playing me at the same time.  

The last two positions show another typical clue to look for tactics, namely, “Sacrificial Possibilities Around the King”. These sacrifices typically take place on the f2, g2, and h2 squares (f7, g7, h7), or the appropriate squares when the King has castled Queenside.  

This position arose after 1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 d5 4.exd5 Nf6 5.Nf3 Nxd5 6.cxd4 Nc6 7.Bc4 e6 8.0–0 Be7 9.Nc3 Nxc3 10.bxc3 0–0 11.Bb3 b6 12.Bc2 Ba6 13.Re1 Rc8 14.Bd2 Bc4 15.Qb1 Kh8. Here I tried the sacrifice 16.Bxh7!? g6 17.Bxg6 fxg6 18.Qxg6 Bf6 19.Ng5 Qe7 20.Re3 Bxg5 21.Rh3+ Bh4 22.Bg5 Qg7 23.Rxh4+ Kg8 24.Qxg7+ Kxg7 25.Bh6+ Kg6 26.Bxf8 Rxf8 27.Rg4+ Kf5 28.Rg3 Rc8 29.Rf3+ Kg5 30.Rg3+ Kf5 31.Rf3+ Kg5 32.Rg3+ Kf5 and the computer accepted the draw by repetition of moves as I only had a few minutes left. 

Radio Shack C2150 was my first computer boasting a rating of 2150, but its strength seemed to be around 1500. Unlike today’s chess software, this one would make the exact same mistake over and over again.

The game went along typical classical dragon lines with 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.Be3 Bg7 7.f3 0–0 8.Qd2 Nc6 9.g4 Bd7 10.Nxc6 bxc6. After beginning its Kingside attack however, the computer played 11.Bg2? Qa5 12.0–0–0 Rfb8 13.a3. Here I finished the computer off with 13…Rxb2! (Tactic: Demolition of pawn structure)14.Kxb2 Nxe4! (Tactic: Clearance of a Diagonal) 15.fxe4 Rb8+ (Tactic: Removal of The Guard) 16.Ka2 Be6+ 17.Nd5 Rb2+ 18.Ka1 Qxa3# 0–1 

Conclusion:  

I presented you with eleven clues or motifs in a position that tells you a tactical shot might be available:  

  • Undefended Pieces
  • Weak Pieces or Squares    
  • Unsafe King     
  • Queen, Rook or Bishop in the same file or diagonal with the opponent’s King or Queen     
  • Forks and Pins     
  • Checks    
  • Batteries    
  • Back rank weaknesses 
  • Passed pawns on the sixth or seventh rans     
  • Positional advantages such as control of file or diagonal
  • Sacrificial possibilities around f2,g2,h2 or appropriate pawns in queenside castling. 

It is my hope that those readers who have been working hard honing their tactical skills can make use of the ideas presented in this article, and help you avoid missing winning shots in their games.    

The Thrill of the Simul: Drawing GM Andy Soltis at a Simultaneous Exhibition

July 20, 2006

GM Andy Soltis and I

By Louis Lima

In 2002 I flew to Reno to play my very first large tournament ever. It was the “20th Annual Western State Open”. The main reason I participated in this event was because one of my dreams at the time was to play in a simultaneous exhibition and be able to beat or draw the GM. The tournament offered the opportunity to play a clock simul against IM John Donaldson, and a non-clock simul against GM Andy Soltis.  At the time I had a rating of 1540 with the US Chess Federation. 

Mr. Donaldson played the Maroczy Bind against my Sicilian and was strangled in less than 30 moves. Unfazed by my loss, I faced GM Andy Soltis the next evening. I am very proud of this game not only because I was able to obtain a draw, but because I was able to find the right defensive moves and noticed all of his tactical threats. It was also one of the first times I planned a series of moves based on a specific idea (trapping his rook along the h-file). 

Sicilian Defense

Sozin System  

GM Andy Soltis vs. Louis Lima (1540) 

1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 d6 3.Nge2 Nc6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Nf6 6.Bc4 g6?! 

I used to enjoy playing the Dragon and was trying, perhaps a little too hard, to steer the game along those channels.   

7.Nxc6 bxc6 8.e5  

The first threat of the game. At the time I thought I had blundered and lost the game with 6…g6 remembering 8…dxe5 9.Bxf7 Kxf7 10.Qxd8 which some players have fallen for, including two 2100 rated players according to my chess database! Now I know that the 6…g6 line is playable. Emanuel Lasker who “fell” for this trap (According to T.Harding in the “Sicilian Sozin”) was able to draw against Carl Schelecter at the 10th World Chess Championship. Bobby Fischer once finished off a player at a simul in 1964 after 8…Nd7?! 9.exd6 exd6 10. 0-0 d5 11.Nxd5! Nc5 (11…cxd5 12.Qxd5 threatening mate on f7 and the undefended rook on a8) 12.Qd4 cxd5 13.Bb5+ Bd7 14.Bxd7+ Qxd7 15.Qxh8 f5 16.Re1+ Ne6 17.Qf6 1-0.  

8…Ng4 9.e6  

It took me some horrifying seconds to find 9…f5, simultaneously protecting the f pawn and the Knight on g4. I should have seen all this before playing 8…Ng4.  

9…f5 10.0–0 Bg7 11.h3 Nf6 12.Re1 0-0 13.Bf4  

Threatening 14.Bxd6 exd6 15. e7+ discovery check winning the Queen or 14.Bxd6 Qxd6 15.Qxd6 Qxd6 16.e7+ winning the Rook and d pawn for the Bishop.   

13…Ne8  

13…d5!? was an interesting alternative. For instance, if 14.Bb3 then 14…Ne4 and perhaps play against White’s overextended e pawn. I was mistakenly concerned about the weakening of the h1-a8 diagonal which I thought could also prevent me from making use of the b file with my rook later on. White, however, had very different plans on the part of the board that mattered.  

14.Qd2 Kh8  

This move gets me away from the x-ray attack by the Bishop on b3, as White could renew the discovery threat after Rad1. My main purpose for this move, however, was to begin building pressure on the e pawn by moves like Rf6, Ng7, and Qg8 in conjunction with the Bishop on c8. This piece arrangement also allowed me to get the Queen’s help in staving mate along the h-file a few moves later.    

15.Bh6 Bxh6 16.Qxh6 Ng7 17.Rad1 Rf6 18.Rd4 Bxe6 19.Rh4 Qg8 20.Bxe6 Rxe6 21.Rxe6 Nxe6 (21…Qxe6?? 22.Qxh2++) 22.Qe3  

White’s e pawn has fallen and his Kingside attack came up short. Now White has to waste time extricating his pieces off the h-file to more useful positions. 22.Qe3 seems an effective move. It ties up my Queen to the defense of the Knight while keeping a vigil on the weak f pawn. Another plan for White could have been to shift the Rook over to the queenside and contest the b file.  

Here I began a long think and remember having to pass twice when Mr.Soltis came by my board, which he graciously accepted. I wanted to trap his Rook and was calculating ways of achieving this.   

22…f4 23.Qe4 h5!?  

Sacrificing a pawn in order to gain time to prevent any escape squares for the Rook, and to begin preparing g5 and Qc7. The move is not so obvious to find, as one usually does not push the pawn in front of one’s King when an enemy Rook is on the same file!   

24.Qxc6?! 

After 24.Ne2 Rf8 25.Nxf4 Rxf4 26.Rxf4 Nxf4 27.Qxf4 Qe6 White gets his pawn back but with a slightly better pawn configuration of two islands versus three of mine. The Queens being on the board though, seem to make this a very drawish position.    

24…Rc8  

My plan to trap the Rook involved placing the Queen on c7 to defend the h pawn after g5. Thus, I did not want to leave the Rook undefended. Perhaps a better temporizing move would have been 24…Rb8!? attacking the queenside pawns. If 25.g3 then c3 would be weak.  

25. Qe4 Qf7 26.Ne2?!  

26.Nd5 seems to accomplish the same goal of pressuring the f pawn, while being placed on a more active position.  

26…g5 27.Rxh5+ Qxh5 28.Qxe6 Rxc2 29.Nc3 Rc1+?! 

Here I missed an opportunity to force White into a more defensive position by 29…Qh4 30.Nd1 Rc1 31.Qe2, and now I have a variety of moves to choose from such as 31…Qh7 or 31…g4 (32.Qxg4?? Qxg4 33.hxg4 losing the Knight).  

30.Kh2 g4 31.Qxe7 gxh3?! 

Here I had the chance to swap off the Queens after 31…g3+ 32.fxg3 fxg3+ 33.Kxg3 Qe5+ 34.Qxe5+ dxe5 35.Nd5 but was unsure about the resulting material imbalance.  

32.Qf6+ Kg8 33.Qe6+ Kh8 

Later on after the game I found a way to make some headway. After 33…Qf7 34.Qc8+ Kg7 35.gxh3 Qg6 36.Qb7+ Kh6 was another possibility that I missed. 

34.Qf6+= Kg8 ½–½ 

Mr. Soltis made his made his last move and offered me a draw, which I accepted when he returned to my board. The main tournament would begin the next morning, but I had already gotten my draw against one of my favorite chess authors, and that is all that counted then.